<%@ Page Language="vb" EnableViewState="true" EnableSessionState="true" CodeBehind="loadForm.vb" Inherits="eSignProcess.loadForm"%> Employee Performance Evaluation

WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
Employee Performance Evaluation
Employee's Name:
Classification:
Annual Evaluation
Probation Mid-Point Evaluation
Institution/Department:
Evaluation Period:
From: To:
Evaluation Date:
Performance Factors Performance Objectives:  Comments and/or examples (Attach extra sheets if needed) Rating
1.  Quality of Work
Competence, accuracy, neatness, thoroughness.
Outstanding*
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory*
2.  Quantity of Work
Use of time, volume of work accomplished, ability to meet schedules, productivity levels.
Outstanding*
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory*
3.  Job Knowledge
Degree of technical knowledge, understanding of job procedures and methods.
Outstanding*
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory*
4.  Working Relationships
Cooperation and ability to work with supervisor, co-workers, students, and clients served.
Outstanding*
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory*
5.  Supervisory Skills
Training and directing subordinates, delegation, evaluating subordinates, planning and organizing work, problem solving, decision making ability, ability to communicate.
Outstanding*
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory*
6.  Optional Factor
Examples include communication skills, adaptability, judgment, initiative, problem solving, etc.
Outstanding*
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory*
DEFINITIONS OF PERFORMANCE RATING CATEGORIES
OUTSTANDING*-The employee has exceeded all of the performance expectations for this factor and has made many significant contributions to the efficiency and economy of this organization through such performance.

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS - The employee regularly works beyond a majority of the performance expectations of this factor and has made significant contributions to the efficiency and economy of this organization through such performance.

MEETS EXPECTATIONS - The employee has met the performance expectations for this factor and has contributed to the efficiency and economy of this organization.

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT - The employee has failed to meet one or more of the significant performance expectations for this factor.

UNSATISFACTORY* - The employee has failed to meet the performance expectations for this factor.

* Give specific examples of this employee’s performance
 
7.  Specific Achievements (Use additional sheets if necessary)
8.  Performance Goals for the Next Evaluation Period
9.  Training and Development Suggestions
10.  Attendance (Supervisor's Comments)
Supervisor's Name (Print or Type)
Title
Signature*
Date Rated
Employee's Comments
This performance evaluation was discussed with me on the date noted above.  I understand that my signature attests only that a review session was held with me; it does not necessarily indicate that I agree with the evaluation.
Employee's Signature
Date Signed
Department Head's Comments
Name (Print or Type)
Title
Signature
Date Reviewed

*Upon completion of all signatures, provide a copy of this review to employee.  Forward original to Personnel file located in Human Resources.